This is the review of the second book in the Great War trilogy, Walk in Hell. Beginning in 1916, it sees soldiers charging towards enemy trenches in the hopes of taking them, with machine guns hammering death at the incoming infantry, of artillery shelling No Mans Land day and night, delivering death to all with high explosive rounds and poison gas, of airplanes buzzing above the tortured landscape, watching the carnage unraveling beneath them, of armored fortresses instilling fear into the enemy as they crawled through the battered and broken battlefield, pounding the enemy with cannon and machine gun fire. A fine scene to describe World War 1, don't you think?Yes, Walk in Hell covers all of this, WWI fought not just in Europe, but also on the North American continent. The United States, allied with Germany, is fighting a two war front against Canada to the north and the Confederacy to the south. The U.S. has put down the Mormon uprising in Utah and introduced a new weapon into the fray, the barrel (tank), while their navy continues to threaten England of her food supply. Meanwhile, Confederate blacks rise up in a socialist revolution against their white overlords, drawing precious Confederate men from the front to quell it and that's about it. This sums up the entire book.
Personally, I think 'Walk in Hell' is written to bridge together the first and third book in the trilogy, highlighting several minor developments that play a major role in the next book, so it does not offer much.
The writing style is similar to the first book, the story told from the viewpoint of several characters from both sides, from soldiers (no Canadian soldiers) to civilians to politicians (mostly U.S. side). The events, as depicted from above, seem plausible, although it would be appreciated if there are more naval developments described in the book. No need for something as major as the Battle of the Three Navies in 'American Front', but other forms of development in the high seas would be much appreciated. In addition, there are still no descriptions of the state of the war in Europe.
All in all, it's a good read. I'll rate it at 3.5 out of 5.
